这个男人来自地球

卓荣泰要韩国瑜学好“法律”，翁晓玲反呛：不知道他的念到哪里去_我的网站

海边的曼彻斯特

一 | AI摘要韩国瑜与卓荣泰隔空交锋，翁晓玲力挺韩并反呛卓。

China US Photo:VCGAmerican scientists have voiced opposition to a proposed rule which seeks to ban federal funding for US science collaboration with China, saying that it would instead hurt US interest, the Washington Post reported on Tuesday. Chinese experts also warned that the slew of US restrictions on China-US scientific cooperation is unlikely to deal a fatal blow to China's scientific development, but could instead backfire on the US.
The proposed Office of Management and Budget (OMB) rule, set to take effect in December, would mark one of the biggest overhauls of US science funding in decades, giving political appointees greater authority over grant awards previously guided by scientific peer review and requiring that they "advance the President's policy priorities," according to the Washington Post.
It would also effectively expand the 2011 Wolf Amendment, which bars scientists from using NASA funding for bilateral collaborations with China, to all federal agencies and scientists receiving federal funds, marking the largest break in US-China scientific engagement in decades, the US media outlet reported.
So far, the proposed rule has garnered nearly half a million public comments, many from scientists and leading US science bodies. A Washington Post analysis of 50,000 of those comments found that around 88 percent were negative.
The rule, initially set to take effect in October, was pushed back to December after a bipartisan stopgap funding bill temporarily halted its adoption. Unlike the Wolf Amendment, the rule does not require congressional approval to take effect.
"I do think there are still members of Congress who think we have a monopoly on knowledge. They think we're still in the Cold War Soviet era ... where we were ahead in most areas of science and technology. That is not the case with China. We are no longer the leader in many areas of science," said Tobin Smith, senior vice president for government relations and public policy at the Association for American Universities, which advocates on behalf of leading US research universities, per the Washington Post.
Scientists warn that the rule risks subjecting long-term scientific research to four-year political cycles. "We will not succeed if with every new administration we are ping-ponging back and forth about priorities," the American Association for the Advancement of Science said in a blistering comment, urging the administration to withdraw the rule. "Fast-tracking such profound changes ... hands an easy victory to nations like China," it said, the Washington Post reported.
This reflects a fundamental divide between the US government and the scientific community over how science should develop, Wang Yiwei, a professor at Renmin University of China's School of International Studies, told the Global Times. He noted that politicians tend to believe that suppressing China as a competitor would allow the US to preserve its market dominance and technological edge.
Scientists, however, tend to follow a different logic, as scientific progress depends on openness, exchanges and collaboration. If science and technology are driven solely by competition and private capital, with the ultimate goal of maintaining technological monopolies, this could create greater risks and ultimately undermine US interests as well, Wang said.
The proposed rule change is the latest salvo in a broader battle in Washington over how to respond to China's rise as a scientific superpower. In July, the US National Science Foundation (NSF) also moved to ban collaborations between scientist it funds and many Chinese research institutions and their employees, according to Science magazine.
Liu Shaoshan, director of the Center for Embodied AI at the Shenzhen Institute of Artificial Intelligence and Robotics for Society and a former US-based researcher, told the Global Times in a previous interview that the NSF's new proposed rules created a "talent wall," arguing that restrictions based on nationality, institutional affiliation, and research partnerships could reduce the global talent pool available to the US, weaken its ability to attract leading scientists, and slow scientific innovation.
Liu also said scientific advancement relies not only on discovery but also on the exchange, validation, and dissemination of knowledge.
Wang also said China has built significant strengths through its vast pool of scientists and engineers, complete industrial chains and massive application scenarios, while increasingly moving from application-oriented innovation toward original research. Against this backdrop, US technological blockades and restrictions on cooperation are unlikely to halt China's progress, but could instead isolate American scientists from China's latest research and collaboration opportunities. Such an approach could also prevent the two countries from leveraging their respective strengths and ultimately undermine US competitiveness, Wang said.
。她批卓违法违宪、不懂法律，直言其不适格适任，强调副署制度旨在制衡而非对付立法权。台民意机构负责人韩国瑜与台行政机构负责人卓荣泰18日晚隔空交锋，韩国瑜直指，“执政权”再大也大不过台湾地区现行宪制性规定，卓荣泰则反批韩国瑜应读好台湾地区现行宪制性规定及“预算法”。国民党民代翁晓玲19日受访力挺韩国瑜，反呛卓荣泰“不知道他念到哪里去了”。

二 | 翁晓玲并直言，卓荣泰早已不是一名适格、适任的行政机构负责人。翁晓玲表示，她非常支持韩国瑜的做法，自己也一再强调，面对“行政权”扩张，以及台湾地区领导人赖清德、卓荣泰“违法”、违反宪制性规定的行为，台民意机构应该采取严正立场。韩国瑜发文警告并要求卓荣泰，必须依照台湾地区现行宪制性规定的义务完成副署，立场相当清楚。

三 | 翁晓玲指出，卓荣泰具有法律背景，但她不知道卓荣泰的法律究竟“学到哪里去了”。任何具有基本法律常识及素养的人，都应知道遵守法律、遵守台湾地区现行宪制性规定是台湾人的义务。何况卓荣泰身为台行政机构负责人，竟连这项基本知识都没有。翁晓玲强调，台湾地区现行宪制性规定的副署制度，是用来监督、制衡台湾地区领导人，而不是拿来对付“立法权”。